DOFPro Team

\(2.00\ \mathrm{kmol/s}\) of propane are burned in 25% excess dry air in a faulty combustor. 100% of the hydrogen combusts to form water, but only 80% of the carbon combusts completely to \(\mathrm{CO_2}\). The remainder combusts to \(\mathrm{CO}\).
There are multiple sets of chemical equations we could write. We will consider two sets:
\[ \mathrm{C_3H_8 + 5O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{3CO_2 + 4 H_2O} \tag{1}\]
\[ \mathrm{C_3H_8 + \frac{7}{2}O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{3CO + 4H_2O} \tag{2}\]
or
\[ \mathrm{C_3H_8 + \frac{7}{2}O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{3CO + 4H_2O} \tag{3}\]
\[ \mathrm{CO + \frac{1}{2}O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{CO_2} \tag{4}\]
To calculate excess, you need to calculate complete combustion. The appropriate equation is Equation 1.
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2stoic} = \frac{\nu_\mathrm{O_2}}{\nu_\mathrm{C_3H_8}} \dot{n}_\mathrm{C_3H_8stoic} = \frac{-5}{-1}(2\ \mathrm{kmol/s}) = 10\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \mathrm{frac.\ xs} = 0.25 = \frac{ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} - \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2stoic} }{\dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2stoic}} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} = (1 + \mathrm{frac.\ xs})\dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2stoic} = 1.25(10\ \mathrm{kmol/s})= 12.5\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2in} = \frac{79}{21}\dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} = \frac{79}{21}(12.5\ \mathrm{kmol/s}) = 47.0\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\text{Air-in} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} + \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2in} = 12.5 + 47.0 = \boxed{ 59.5\ \mathrm{kmol/s}} \]
The full set of mole balances with Equation 1 and Equation 2 is
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{C_3H_8out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{C_3H_8in} - \dot{\xi}_1 - \dot{\xi}_2 \implies \dot{\xi}_1 + \dot{\xi}_2 = 2\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2in} + 3\dot{\xi}_1 + 0 \boldsymbol{\cdot} \dot{\xi}_2 \implies \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = 3\dot{\xi}_1 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{COin} + 0 \boldsymbol{\cdot} \dot{\xi}_1 + 3 \dot{\xi}_2 \implies \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = 3\dot{\xi}_2 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} - 5\dot{\xi}_1 - 3.5 \dot{\xi}_2 = 12.50\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - 5\dot{\xi}_1 - 3.5 \dot{\xi}_2 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2in} + 0 \boldsymbol{\cdot} \dot{\xi}_1 +0 \boldsymbol{\cdot} \dot{\xi}_2 = \boxed{ 47.0\ \mathrm{kmol/s} } \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oout} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oin} + 4 \dot{\xi}_1 + 4 \dot{\xi}_2 = 4 \dot{\xi}_1 + 4 \dot{\xi}_2 \]
Applying the \(\mathrm{CO_2}\)-to-\(\mathrm{CO}\) constraint
\[ \frac{\dot{n}_\mathrm{COout}}{\dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out}} = \frac{1 - 0.80}{0.80}=0.25 = \frac{3\dot{\xi}_2}{3\dot{\xi}_1} = \frac{\dot{\xi}_2}{\dot{\xi}_1} \]
\[ \dot{\xi}_1 + \dot{\xi}_2 = 2\ \mathrm{kmol/s} = \dot{\xi}_1 + 0.25 \dot{\xi}_1 = 1.25 \dot{\xi}_1 \]
\[ \implies \dot{\xi}_1 = 1.6\ \mathrm{kmol/s},\ \dot{\xi}_2 = 0.4\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \implies \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = 3 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 1.6\ \mathrm{kmol/s} = \boxed{ 4.8\ \mathrm{kmol/s} }, \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = 3 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 0.4\ \mathrm{kmol/s} = \boxed{ 1.2\ \mathrm{kmol/s} } \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2out} = 12.5\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - 5 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 1.6 - 3.5 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 0.4 = \boxed{ 3.10\ \mathrm{kmol/s} } \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oout} = 4 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 1.6 + 4 \boldsymbol{\cdot} 0.4 = \boxed{ 8.00\ \mathrm{kmol/s} } \]
To get the dry and wet compositions, divide the species molar flow rate by either the sum of the species molar flow rates minus the water flow rate, or by the sum of the species molar flow rates. The results are on the spreadsheet.
\[ x_{i\ (\mathrm{dry})} = \frac{\dot{n}_i}{(\sum \dot{n}_j) - \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2O}} \]
\[ x_{i\ (\mathrm{wet})} = \frac{\dot{n}_i}{\sum \dot{n}_j} \]
A spreadsheet of the solution is shown below
The full set of mole balances with Equation 3 and Equation 4 is
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{C_3H_8out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{C_3H_8in} - \dot{\xi}_3 \implies \dot{\xi}_3 = 2\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2in} + \dot{\xi}_4 \implies \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = \dot{\xi}_4 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{COin} + 3 \dot{\xi}_3 - \dot{\xi}_4 \implies \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = 6\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - \dot{\xi}_4 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2in} - 3.5 \dot{\xi}_3 - 0.5 \dot{\xi}_4 = 12.50\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - 7\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - 0.5 \dot{\xi}_4 \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2out} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{N_2in} = 47.0\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oout} = \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oin} + 4 \dot{\xi}_3 = 8\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
Applying the \(\mathrm{CO_2}\)-to-\(\mathrm{CO}\) constraint
\[ \frac{\dot{n}_\mathrm{COout}}{\dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out}} = \frac{1 - 0.80}{0.80}=0.25 = \frac{6 - \dot{\xi}_4}{\dot{\xi}_4} \implies \dot{\xi}_4 = 4.8\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{CO_2out} = \dot{\xi}_4 = 4.8\ \mathrm{kmol/s}, \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{COout} = 6\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - \dot{\xi}_4 = 1.2\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{O_2out} = 5.5\ \mathrm{kmol/s} - 0.5 \dot{\xi}_4 = 3.10\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
\[ \dot{n}_\mathrm{H_2Oout} = 4 \dot{\xi}_3 = 8.00\ \mathrm{kmol/s} \]
A spreadsheet of the solution is shown below
The stoichiometric coefficients and extents of reaction are different from the first spreadsheet. However, the molar flows and the mole fractions or compositions are identical to those in the version with Equation 1 and Equation 2. As long as you set up a linearly independent balanced set of equations that uses all of the species, it doesn’t matter what set you use. The flows and compositions will all come out the same.
Thanks for watching!
The Full Story companion video is in the link in the upper left. The companion video in the series, Flame On, Torch!, is in the upper right. To learn more about Chemical and Thermal Processes, visit the website linked in the description.

